Less Than Stimulating Conversations
February 18th, 2008I’m beginning to have my doubts about the new economic stimulus package. On the surface it would seem that the new higher loan limits should help Bay Area families to afford to buy a house. But there’s so much more to it, that I’m beginning to wonder how much help it’s going to be.
On the one hand, yes, we’ll have conforming loans up to $730,000. Take the average $900,000 house in Pleasanton, put 10% down, and you’ll get a conforming 80% first mortgage and a reasonable 10% second to go behind it - something that’s not very easy to do at the present moment (pre-stimulus/post subprime-jumbo meltdown).
And I’m not saying that I don’t want my $300. Or is it $1200 because I’ve got kids? Or do I not qualify because I made more than $42,000 last year? But my kids would qualify? Oh forget it, the loan-limits thing is way less confusing.
But wait a second, those new jumbo-sized conforming loans are going to have their limitations. It looks like you’ll have your choice of 30 or 15-year fixed products, fully amortized of course. That means no interest-only payments, no adjustable rates.
Along with the higher loan amount will come a higher interest rates (risk and return are indeed correlated, no bill is going to change that). We’re already seeing that effect in the market, rates seemed to go up for no reason at all last week.
I heard this bill referred to as “Economic Cialis” - it may help us out for a period of time, but when it wears off we’re still left with the same underlying problem, be that a slowing economy, a correction in housing, or a full-blown recession.
It’s an interesting discussion, for a while. But I’m really unsure how it’s going to play out. If it works and gets the market moving, and they’re really going to cut-it-off on December 31st, I can only imagine what the last two months of the year are going to be like.
So is this the jumpstart that we need? Is it a band-aid? Does it get us throught the toughest part of the market? What do YOU think? Leave a comment, and keep the discussion going…










Posted by Tom Schieber

Our job as “agents” is to represent the best interests of the principals for whom we work (our buyers and sellers). And rarely (never) is it in their best interest to beat-down the party on the other end of their transaction. What is in their best interest is buying or selling their property, in the right time frame, for the right price, with the right amount of exposure.
I was talking with an agent this morning who said that he tells clients that if they don’t have a friend with a real estate license then they probably don’t have any friends!
In the past seven days, since I got my
provide to “get out” of the office or the house.
I’ve been living without a laptop computer for two months now, and I’m discovering just how much I need one. I know, in the grand scheme of things it’s not really one of the things I need. But my lifestyle, the way I live and certainly the way I work have been drastically altered without it. And it got me thinking about the other non-necessities that I never want to live without.
Just as every part of the Real Estate market is experiencing monumental change, there’s something very familiar going on in the background.
RSS Feed



